Missouri

  Aviation Lawyers.
HOME ABOUT US FAQ'S RESOURCES CONTACT US FREE CASE REVIEW
January 05, 2009
Aviation
             
 
Selecting an attorney for legal cases is a very important decision. Please enter your information below to receive a Free Consultation from an attorney in your area:
 
Zip Code:   
 

Aviation News

 

Argentine Republic International Aviation Safety Assessment Rating of Category 2

WASHINGTON – The U.S. Department of Transportation’s Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) today announced that the Argentine Republic does not comply with international safety standards set by the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) and has been given a Category 2 rating following a reassessment of the country’s civil aviation authority. The Argentine Republic was previously rated Category 1.

The government of Argentina has indicated its desire to correct the issues identified as a result of the FAA reassessment. The FAA will continue to remain engaged with the civil aviation authority of Argentina and will periodically review the situation.

This announcement is part of the FAA’s International Aviation Safety Assessment (IASA) program, under which the agency assesses the civil aviation authorities of all countries with air carriers that operate to the United States and makes that information available to the public.

The assessments are not an indication of whether individual foreign carriers are safe or unsafe. Rather, they determine whether or not foreign civil aviation authorities are meeting ICAO safety standards, not FAA regulations.

Countries with air carriers that fly to the United States must adhere to the safety standards of ICAO, the United Nation’s technical agency for aviation that establishes international standards and recommended practices for aircraft operations and maintenance.

The FAA, with the cooperation of the host civil aviation authority, assesses countries with airlines that have operating rights to or from the United States or have requested such rights.

Specifically, the FAA determines whether a foreign aviation authority has an adequate infrastructure for international aviation safety oversight as defined by ICAO standards, including: 1) laws enabling the appropriate government office to adopt regulations necessary to meet the minimum requirements of ICAO; 2) current regulations that meet those requirements; 3) procedures to carry out the regulatory requirements: 4) air carrier certification, routine inspection, and surveillance programs; and 5) organizational and personnel resources to implement and enforce the above.

The FAA has established two ratings for the status of these civil aviation authorities at the time of the assessment: (One) does comply with ICAO standards, (Two) does not comply with ICAO standards.

·Category 1. Does Comply with ICAO Standards: A civil aviation authority has been assessed by FAA inspectors and has been found to license and oversee air carriers in accordance with ICAO aviation safety standards.

·Category 2. Does Not Comply with ICAO Standards: The FAA assessed Argentina’s civil aviation authority and determined that it does not provide safety oversight of its air carrier operators in accordance with the minimum safety oversight standards established by ICAO. This rating is applied if one or more of the following deficiencies are identified: 1) the country lacks laws or regulations necessary to support the certification and oversight of air carriers in accordance with minimum international standards; 2) the civil aviation authority lacks the technical expertise, resources and organization to license or oversee the air carrier operations; 3) the civil aviation authority does not have adequately trained and qualified technical personnel; 4) the civil aviation authority does not provide adequate inspector guidance to ensure enforcement of, and compliance with, minimum international standards; and 5) the civil aviation authority has insufficient documentation and record of certification and inadequate continuing oversight and surveillance of air-carrier operations. This category consists of two groups of countries: ·One group is countries that have air carriers with existing operations to the United States at the time of the assessment. While in Category 2 status, carriers from these countries will be permitted to continue operations at current levels under heightened FAA surveillance. Expansion or changes in services to the United States by such carriers are not permitted while in Category 2, although new services will be permitted if operated using aircraft wet-leased from a duly authorized and properly supervised U.S. carrier or a foreign air carrier from a Category 1 country that is authorized to serve the United States using its own aircraft. ·The second group is countries that do not have air carriers with existing operations to the United States at the time of the assessment. Carriers from these countries will not be permitted to commence service to the United States while in Category 2 status, although they may conduct services if operated using aircraft wet-leased from a duly authorized and properly supervised U.S. carrier or a foreign air carrier from a Category 1 country that is authorized to serve the United States with its own aircraft. No other distinction is made between these two groups of countries while in Category 2.

The FAA has assisted civil aviation authorities with less than acceptable ratings by providing technical expertise, assistance with inspections, and training courses. The FAA hopes to work with other countries through ICAO to address non-compliance with international aviation safety oversight standards.

The FAA will continue to release the results of safety assessments to the public as they are completed. First announced in September 1994, the ratings are part of an ongoing FAA program to assess all countries with air carriers that operate to the United States.

Are you seeking legal information regarding Missouri aviation laws? If so, contact our expert Missouri aviation attorneys today!

 
Did You Know?    
 
 
Private pilots must be at least 17 years old and have a minimum of 40 hours of flight time
The actual average is about 65 hours), including 20 hours of instruction and 10 hours solo. Pilots trained according to accelerated curricula defined in Part 141 of the Federal Aviation Regulations may be certified with a minimum of 35 hours. Private pilots may not fly for hire but may share equally with their passengers the direct expenses of a flight – specifically, fuel, oil, airport transient parking/landing fees, and aircraft rental charges.

 


  Newsroom  
 


News about Aviation cases in Missouri and nationwide:

NTSB Marks 10Th Anniversary Of Crash Of TWA 800
Washington DC - With the 10th anniversary of the crash of TWA Flight 800 approaching, the National Transportation Safety Board today released a fac...
Read more >


Aviation Chairman Lott: $4 Million Headed For Airports In 14 Mississippi Counties
"Improving Mississippi’s airport facilities means better safety for individuals who use these facilities as well as increased leverage in the ongoi...
Read more >


More Aviation News >

 
 

Aviation Lawyers.com Terms

 


Today's Terms

Anti-icing

Definition:
Is turned on before the flight enters icing conditions. Typically this includes carburetor heat, prop heat, pitot eat, fuel vent heat, windshield heat, and fluid surface deicers (in some cases). Then when the boots deflate, a “bridge” of ice remains that cannot be shed during the next inflation cycle. Although some residual ice may remain after a boot

AGTP

Definition:
Aircraft Gas Turbine Powerplants

Inversion Illusion

Definition:
An abrupt change from climb to straight-and-level flight can excessively stimulate the sensory organs for gravity and linear acceleration, creating the illusion of tumbling backwards.

More Aviation Lawyers.com Terms >

 

Aviation Law Resources

 


Search Aviation Law resources in our resource center:

More Aviation Resources >

 

Aviation Legal Hot Topics

 
Topics Related to Aviation Law:

  • Small Plane Crash Icing
  • Pilot Errors & Negligence
  • Maintenance Problems
  • Violating FAA Regulations
  • Structural Design Problems

More Aviation Topics >

Missouri Aviation Attorney

 
If you live in the following cities and need an Aviation attorney you should contact our Aviation Attorney as soon as possible:

  • Arnold
  • Ballwin
  • Belton
  • Blue Springs
  • Cape Girardeau
  • Chesterfield
  • Columbia
  • Fenton
  • Florissant
  • Grandview
  • Independence
  • Jefferson City
  • Joplin
  • Kansas City
  • Lebanon
  • Liberty
  • O Fallon
  • Poplar Bluff
  • Rolla
  • Saint Charles
  • Saint Louis
  • Saint Peters
  • Sedalia
  • Sikeston
  • Springfield
 


Legal Disclaimers
All attorney listings are a paid attorney advertisement, and do not in any way constitute a referral or endorsement by an approved or authorized lawyer referral service. The information provided on Missouri Aviation Lawyers.com is not intended to be legal advice, but merely conveys general information related to legal issues commonly encountered. Your access to and use of this website is subject to additional Terms and Conditions.

Local Professional? Generate new business today
Call 866-227-9356 or contact a sales rep


This site is part of the LawFirms.com Network
©2009 ExpertHub, wholly owned subsidiary of MoxyMedia, Inc.